Acrostic Poems For B A G

I'm in a crisis!

Since we have yet so excited that bankers million give bonuses

system, even if the net result in the red

stuck. Now, for bonus sustainability is required.

I get now, the crisis that this behavior up to the highest offices of state

has penetrated. Or it is only now becoming visible?

Since you can but as President, just throw away without prior notice

his job. And is then passed with highest honors

. As says the federal Pres. just two hours

before the plonk press conference the Chancellor know:
"April, April, the week is designed differently than you have."

The mayor of Bremen, who now is his "successor", undergoes spontaneous: "Pack Ruckzuck, your weekly planning is no longer valid, your family

see you this week no longer are you working this week in Berlin."

It's not only a political decision, he took very

directly into the private lives of people. Interesting, "with immediate effect"

the sentence. " of MY OFFICE I want to avert damage

. Not by the office of your President.

So throw away, without a transition period and then there's the

large tattoo, adoption with the highest "honor" and

then he may want another song. Is not it great? Where is there

the difference to the bankers, the farewell to high

severance want. Is it the same principle: If me

"contractual" too! Koehler also gets an excellent board

and no deductions.

And then there's Opel. GM still has last year, Germany

very offended when the company after many rescue attempts and

government loans provided a framework for the rescue with new

investors to me anything you nothing suddenly declined.

And then come again this year and want government guarantees.

And says not a high state officials, "that you had time you should consider before

as you deal with us."

If manners also play at the highest levels no longer
, one need but do not be surprised if this
is common practice.

And now even more generally, to the politicians. As the saying but
before, "with the party may not be xy form a coalition that is
unconstitutional or is not on the floor of the
Basic Law". This is not merely a statement about
a party, but a statement about people that you have used
democratic right to choose an approved

to choose party. Then I ask myself sometimes what the audacity to

actually. Let them say, "I do not, I think the incompetent,"

or something similar. But with the Basic Law, we can

times better off.

Or do I have to ask myself the question, is there at all politicians,

standing on the floor of the Basic Law? What all do for

sayings and how to deal with each other, which had elected

departure of the President of words .....

Is it not in the constitution, human dignity is inviolable?

And also they do not understand that we have no real financial crisis,

but "only" a great crisis of values, which also affects the financial sector!

Here again the reference to the speech by Prof. Gunter Dueck,

setting out clearly why we have a crisis and why "our"

the behavior lies at the bottom:

www.sonnenburg.tv

(if you have time, look at all 6 clips and

course like some more on the channel if it is not the same,
because the channel was updated look, please contact the library ;
under Sonnenburg.TV).

For the theory which Prof. Dueck explained here, there was even a Nobel Prize!

Once again, we may even behave differently, and the courage to raise
other manners to maintain. ;
Heed the old saying simply:

"Do you want to change the country, you have to change families,

you want to change the family, you have to ! Change

In this sense I wish you all a very successful weekend!

Sincerely

Wolfgang G. Sonnenburg

winning for life

____

Play Pokemon Sapphire On Computer

to "save" without getting out of the crisis!

with a social consensus, it would be "really" quite

simple, the State finances in order and bring back

course to take prosperous.

Why do we get the consensus out not?

grandfathered, misinformation and abuses of language

keep us from doing so. What I mean by that?

On 5 April you could have read "messages and how they do

us sick." And so now is one of the dramas of the so-called crisis

, what the media make of it. Often so on

misses and pure fear mongering. Germany stands

as good as any other country.

Clearly a degree of chaos and needs to be better, but the

future can be better than they portrayed in the media

is. The media are now living like this time to make contact,

to generate ratings. Now imagine

times before, all would send and write, it is all ok.

What would happen to the odds?

Here we have a call time recording a

conference calls from our investment rate 15% + added:

http://www.winspiration.de/upload/15ppi/ livecall2010_05_24.mp3

( please excuse the quality of the recording, it was

not intended for publication).

But let's make it clear that the world

large part is different, as shown in the media.

It is best if offered symptom control,

for addressing the real causes. As in medicine,

symptom control does not really sustainable recovery.

What is at?

Look, in May, unemployment was on the

lowest level are 18, the short-time work again

halved last year, the order books are filling up the industry.

and Germany benefited from the favorable euro.

What is the problem?

To a large extent, the mood in the country. If trust

there in the future, the economy is getting better.

What is the relationship goes well, if there is no trust?

For some, the media are responsible for the spread rather

accidents and dramas. But it is also a special

given change, to create the Western world does. ;

Think of times before, in 1890 the first time more people

worked in industry than in agriculture. Is not that long ago

. There was a big boost. And before that there was a

similar crisis like today. 1960 worked for about 25% of

German working population in agriculture and

today only 2%. So a big shift for the industry.

then our education is also aligned.

And what we have now. Rapid reduction of jobs

in the industry. Away from the industry, towards so called

knowledge jobs. For this is a different and high

training needed. As much as it is of course for low

to demand a minimum wage earners, so little is

this but the real solution. Just as it

the preservation of jobs would have saved in agriculture.

Now just to "save." We want to save the government says.

Wikipedia explains : Save the currently free replacement

is a means for later use.

Is that what my leaders?

No call, they save it and my

best to make fewer new debt.

That verbal abuse prevents the solution.

debt is not a bad thing. There are good and bad

. If something is financed, which bring income

, then it's good debt.

consumer loans are bad debt.

So what we need now?

Clear, correct word choice. Consensus that the structural change

other (education, training, further) education requires. Investments

in the future, not a pure system maintenance.

Prof. Dueck has demonstrated upgrade in his book "break" with the idea

Germany "internet standard"

how the country could quickly get out of the crisis.

Would cost around 60 billion. In the household of work

and social dimensions are only about 18 billion for retraining

measures that will bring proven not

the success of which is already about 10 billion

could be used for future investment (Prof. Biedenkopf).

So clear commitment to a restructured future.

More Zukunftskonstruktivität as it is called Prof. Dueck.

willingness to speak plain language, what professions future

have and what not. Readiness spending

to check suitability and future acquis

back to put on.

And then again from the resulting surplus in

state budget, can then debt are made

. We must then call save.

save us us the detours and go straight to the future.

Sincerely

Wolfgang G. Sonnenburg

winning for life

__

How To Make A Wig For A Bjd

Basic Income = unconditional lazy? Discover the

Dear readers of this blog,

with the "Rest of the World and the British version of 16 May

I had already announced that I wanted to do something about

"Basic Income" Leave.

Here are some considerations that I am missing in the public

talk about forever. To avoid misunderstandings

, the "efficiency" of the idea is not so much my

topic. Can see, there may even be by the

reduction of social assistance cash benefits bureaucracy.

see it anyway I am currently not as realistic,

during the restructuring, financial crisis, high

indebtedness that the state trust a new

to design model in which It initially reflect

many newly unemployed would, because where should

the released "bureaucrats" because even if

in unemployment? And it could also become a

new "racism" Lead for who should get this

work-free income? All emigrants

- without exception?

But my real substantive debate

to take place on a deeper level.

Why should such a thing as unconditional

primary care, for want?

In most constitutions of the western world is

accordingly stipulated that "the dignity of man

is inviolable." And so then most currently discussed

it was undignified to perform activities that you do not want

. But who forces you then? If it is said

(just look on You Tube comments to) then

I could finally do what I really want to ask

I: Then why not the same now to do what you want?

Does not even have to earn money is the answer.

Does this mean that what "we" really want to do,

will bring no money? How should then be permanently

finance a system

if not make money like?

But if one can earn the money

what you want, why not then ran the same?

Please You understand me correctly, a company that says

we support any person, without exception, your purpose

(determination-uniqueness) to follow, is also

my dream. But I think that it's not about the

introduction of the "unconditional under budget" is concerned,

but, if at all, only with a social

consensus on values, education and "control"

of values. What I mean by that?

Well, in some ways we already have in many places

unconditional income. This is what we call

social assistance without conditions,

demand as we do not return. Cook it but

even in public again and again up the emotions

when discussing whether to use recipient of

support to work for the common good

allowed. We do not dare to demand a quid pro quo

so it's already "unconditional" income.

What have we gained by it?

I once started the initiative Winspiration-Day,

because in Germany, over 2 million children are, the

in families living on welfare, grow up. ;

If these children through the state money as promoted

to do what is meeting its purpose?

Probably the opposite. In Germany, discussed but

also whether children should spend money as vouchers,

as would most of the parents, it may drown.

But on the "prosperity side" have we have problems with

the handling of "unemployed income." Ca. 80% of

Lotto millionaires are economically worse off after 2 years

than before the profit. Carried over and inherited assets are consumed

in the third generation to about 90%,

"The father create, receive the son, the grandson decays"

the saying goes.

Karl-Heinz Böhm describes in the book of his story about

its relief efforts for Africa, that it took 20 years,

namely a generation to be understood that well ;

not need sanding, but that you do something yourself

can and must, to remain functional.

Prof. Muhammad Yunus told me in conversation that he is

against an unconditional basic income;. Read

the story of his success story and you will understand.

He has helped millions of people out of poverty, especially

by exposure and promotion, by "forcing" of

work. founded on successful self-employment

the new dignity of the "mini-credit recipients.

Erna bars, she spoke at the Winspiration-Day 2006

succeed in school can have on the subject, in your same

illustrated book, which were "conditions" created

to support the children. The children even had the school

clean themselves. These students were the best in Germany

Pisa under study and happy. That reminds me of the wisdom

"Before enlightenment, carry water - after enlightenment

fetch water." So if the idea of unconditional

is not a basic income, more water drag to have to

then it goes wrong.

If it should cause us to a new awareness

drag

water, I am now for it.

But what we have to tamper with "system" that we do

have a chance? As kids growing up that they can learn the

values. We need a different

to education. I thought in terms of evolution but only makes sense if

brings us freedom from the struggle for survival on a new

level of awareness and ability. And this missing

us at the time the support system. So you can record in

Germany that are more social events

is the introduction of social assistance than before the introduction.

And regarding employment, there are today, "Job Center" ;

(job = just over broke). felt by profession and vocation nothing to

. In a society where the middle class disappears,

also form in Formation of two camps.

The highly educated and the uneducated.

This is a social problem. The introduction

from free television, etc. Wikipedia has not also led

that the education level has increased.

We need more reacting joy of learning and active ;

been learned, or we get the problem in

"The British version" the blog of 16 May represented.

If we want only the basic income to offset the

"self service" of the superiors, then it helps

us even further. But it's not just the rulers,

serving themselves. 40 years ago I made a

internship at Siemens. There was a time-clock control.

All were already slick and groomed, waiting

that they were finally stamped. This was stealing time.

Where is a pencil, etc. taken from the company?

So our attitude is crucial, whether a

unconditional income is reasonable. If we were to use it right

, we could lead to new ways of life and come

performance levels. If we change our consciousness

, we would ruin the country completely then.

from "nothin 'is nothin', so the saying goes.

Only when we are ready to further develop our whole society

can fold it. So a bit of Kennedy:

"Ask not only what the country can do for you, but

what I can do for the country"

is like up there. bottom, inside and out.

So we desperately need a new vision for the

Western world, a new definition and the values

appropriate training to do so.

Everyone can at home in his family - with itself - begin.

Sincerely

Wolfgang Sonnenburg

winning for life

PS south of San Francisco there was a small fishing fleet.

After catching the fish were the same except on board

and pelicans were happy about

generations about the offal thrown into the water.

After many years had this fishery from

cost reasons be set.

acted as the pelicans? They threatened to starve.

They had not learned to fish.

After many discussions, whether you feed them should

decision was made for other regions of pelicans,

who were accustomed to fish, to pick and which to settle.

Thus, the Pelicans got to fish again, and all were ;

thus saved. To help themselves!