Dear readers of this blog,
with the "Rest of the World and the British version of 16 May
I had already announced that I wanted to do something about
"Basic Income" Leave.
Here are some considerations that I am missing in the public
talk about forever. To avoid misunderstandings
, the "efficiency" of the idea is not so much my
topic. Can see, there may even be by the
reduction of social assistance cash benefits bureaucracy.
see it anyway I am currently not as realistic,
during the restructuring, financial crisis, high
indebtedness that the state trust a new
to design model in which It initially reflect
many newly unemployed would, because where should
the released "bureaucrats" because even if
in unemployment? And it could also become a
new "racism" Lead for who should get this
work-free income? All emigrants
- without exception?
But my real substantive debate
to take place on a deeper level.
Why should such a thing as unconditional
primary care, for want?
In most constitutions of the western world is
accordingly stipulated that "the dignity of man
is inviolable." And so then most currently discussed
it was undignified to perform activities that you do not want
. But who forces you then? If it is said
(just look on You Tube comments to) then
I could finally do what I really want to ask
I: Then why not the same now to do what you want?
Does not even have to earn money is the answer.
Does this mean that what "we" really want to do,
will bring no money? How should then be permanently
finance a system
if not make money like?
But if one can earn the money
what you want, why not then ran the same?
Please You understand me correctly, a company that says
we support any person, without exception, your purpose
(determination-uniqueness) to follow, is also
my dream. But I think that it's not about the
introduction of the "unconditional under budget" is concerned,
but, if at all, only with a social
consensus on values, education and "control"
of values. What I mean by that?
Well, in some ways we already have in many places
unconditional income. This is what we call
social assistance without conditions,
demand as we do not return. Cook it but
even in public again and again up the emotions
when discussing whether to use recipient of
support to work for the common good
allowed. We do not dare to demand a quid pro quo
so it's already "unconditional" income.
What have we gained by it?
I once started the initiative Winspiration-Day,
because in Germany, over 2 million children are, the
in families living on welfare, grow up. ;
If these children through the state money as promoted
to do what is meeting its purpose?
Probably the opposite. In Germany, discussed but
also whether children should spend money as vouchers,
as would most of the parents, it may drown.
But on the "prosperity side" have we have problems with
the handling of "unemployed income." Ca. 80% of
Lotto millionaires are economically worse off after 2 years
than before the profit. Carried over and inherited assets are consumed
in the third generation to about 90%,
"The father create, receive the son, the grandson decays"
the saying goes.
Karl-Heinz Böhm describes in the book of his story about
its relief efforts for Africa, that it took 20 years,
namely a generation to be understood that well ;
not need sanding, but that you do something yourself
can and must, to remain functional.
Prof. Muhammad Yunus told me in conversation that he is
against an unconditional basic income;. Read
the story of his success story and you will understand.
He has helped millions of people out of poverty, especially
by exposure and promotion, by "forcing" of
work. founded on successful self-employment
the new dignity of the "mini-credit recipients.
Erna bars, she spoke at the Winspiration-Day 2006
succeed in school can have on the subject, in your same
illustrated book, which were "conditions" created
to support the children. The children even had the school
clean themselves. These students were the best in Germany
Pisa under study and happy. That reminds me of the wisdom
"Before enlightenment, carry water - after enlightenment
fetch water." So if the idea of unconditional
is not a basic income, more water drag to have to
then it goes wrong.
If it should cause us to a new awareness
drag water, I am now for it.
But what we have to tamper with "system" that we do
have a chance? As kids growing up that they can learn the
values. We need a different
to education. I thought in terms of evolution but only makes sense if
brings us freedom from the struggle for survival on a new
level of awareness and ability. And this missing
us at the time the support system. So you can record in
Germany that are more social events
is the introduction of social assistance than before the introduction.
And regarding employment, there are today, "Job Center" ;
(job = just over broke). felt by profession and vocation nothing to
. In a society where the middle class disappears,
also form in Formation of two camps.
The highly educated and the uneducated.
This is a social problem. The introduction
from free television, etc. Wikipedia has not also led
that the education level has increased.
We need more reacting joy of learning and active ;
been learned, or we get the problem in
"The British version" the blog of 16 May represented.
If we want only the basic income to offset the
"self service" of the superiors, then it helps
us even further. But it's not just the rulers,
serving themselves. 40 years ago I made a
internship at Siemens. There was a time-clock control.
All were already slick and groomed, waiting
that they were finally stamped. This was stealing time.
Where is a pencil, etc. taken from the company?
So our attitude is crucial, whether a
unconditional income is reasonable. If we were to use it right
, we could lead to new ways of life and come
performance levels. If we change our consciousness
, we would ruin the country completely then.
from "nothin 'is nothin', so the saying goes.
Only when we are ready to further develop our whole society
can fold it. So a bit of Kennedy:
"Ask not only what the country can do for you, but
what I can do for the country"
is like up there. bottom, inside and out.
So we desperately need a new vision for the
Western world, a new definition and the values
appropriate training to do so.
Everyone can at home in his family - with itself - begin.
Sincerely
Wolfgang Sonnenburg
winning for life
PS south of San Francisco there was a small fishing fleet.
After catching the fish were the same except on board
and pelicans were happy about
generations about the offal thrown into the water.
After many years had this fishery from
cost reasons be set.
acted as the pelicans? They threatened to starve.
They had not learned to fish.
After many discussions, whether you feed them should
decision was made for other regions of pelicans,
who were accustomed to fish, to pick and which to settle.
Thus, the Pelicans got to fish again, and all were ;
thus saved. To help themselves!
0 comments:
Post a Comment