I got this question in a comment on my blog
review in August. How could I
deposits in connection with the arms
That speak to but could not afford anything?
Well, sometimes I write here may be somewhat pointedly. But it is not
make sometimes necessary to point out how you can contact
Not?
, I would like to take up again the word choice of first or third world
.
think to speak of different worlds I was a mistake.
As long as we talk in the affluent world of "third world", we suggest
us that there is a world with which we do not
are connected and that what happens there has no bearing on
us.
This applies to me as the word conservation. This term
we use today so that people do not belonged to nature.
why we seem to always realize too late that
events in the so-called third world, or nature, but
can act directly on us.
What is it now when we talk about a world of the rich and the poor
? Is it easy as "poor" in the world of the rich to
change? My theory is, we program the manifestation
of differences.
Feel the difference when we say clearly, there is only one
world where some have decided to be rich
and others poor? Well perhaps now suggests you so much
resistance that you can not trace. But perhaps
we can agree on when there is only one world,
then it should be easier, the "fronts" - the welfare state - to change
than in different worlds.
Now to the accusation that the poor could not even buy shares
, for they have no money. It is the nature of the
people, a living being, not in the survival stress on
long-term care must be ensured. But assuming a
"poor man" (I again apologize for posting this
) may 50, - € to save up.
what we believe would be the idea of using the money? It really
be provided, so there will be more and secures the future?
Are these the first thoughts? Usually not.
I think that's at least my experience from many years
advice, it is unfortunately the norm that people are willing to work
45 years for money, but is not 45 minutes per month
take time to think about money.
In my book I have a 7th Points successful program presented
ie his first point: Decision!
And in a world in which we live, there are people who have
have decided to be responsible and others who often work extremely hard
, and also live a frugal life, but decided not
his own responsibility to tackle the issue of money.
tackling here is to hot to understand monetary affairs, to learn to evaluate
investments etc.. Now I'll always
with conspiracy and faced
the politicians did not want that to be all independent.
again a good reason in their "own world" to stay.
I do not believe it. I can even set up a different theory.
Is there perhaps a conspiracy of the poor? Give us to eat only enough
, then yes we should not educate, do not assume responsibility
. Perhaps you remember, but here goes
not only the so-called poor. It all comes down to,
who think someone else was responsible and it should address.
Prof. Muhammad Yunus, has helped many poor people out of your situation
, it could reach only because it rules out even beggars,
has made to take responsibility and self
actively participate, with a different attitude to different
act. And such were its beginnings? It was always wrong,
because he had given at the beginning not only money and organized
ownership.
Karlheinz Böhm learned that many of his donations fizzled
first because people were not accustomed to watching
own responsibility, so that a new well does not silt up again.
Our system supports many of dependency, in need, but too little
out of necessity. Is this a conspiracy of the poor,
do they only help in time of need? I believe neither the one nor
on the other side of conspiracy. Rather, the weakness of human
, convenient way to take the usual path, no matter how hard he is
. The Modern brain research confirms this.
The spirit is stronger than matter, faith can move mountains
and where there is a will, there'sa way. Not new, but always too little attention
. Check all, what he believes.
who believes in different worlds, "do" it becomes.
who only help in time of need for possible holds, rather than out of necessity, will create more hardship
.
why the poor are getting poorer and the rich richer and that
same in the world.
Today is Sunday.
Have you time for yourself today and new ideas?
Sincerely
Wolfgang Sonnenburg
winning for life
_______
0 comments:
Post a Comment